US wants stake in Africa’s largest airport

The US is pushing to secure a role for American companies in a $12.5 billion Ethiopian Airlines airport project. Washington is seeking greater commercial and infrastructure influence in Africa, where China now has a stronger presence. US Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for the Middle East and Africa Mark Mitchell described Bishoftu International Airport as […]

The post US wants stake in Africa’s largest airport appeared first on The Zimbabwe Mail.

The US is pushing to secure a role for American companies in a $12.5 billion Ethiopian Airlines airport project. Washington is seeking greater commercial and infrastructure influence in Africa, where China now has a stronger presence.

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for the Middle East and Africa Mark Mitchell described Bishoftu International Airport as a “transformative” project during a virtual briefing in Addis Ababa.

“Across agencies… the Department of Commerce has closely engaged in pushing to secure strong United States participation,” he said after talks with Ethiopian Airlines officials.

Mitchell did not identify potential companies or contracts, but said US involvement could result in “more Boeing aircraft powered by GE Aerospace engines.” Ethiopian Airlines agreed in April to purchase six additional Boeing 787-9s.

Construction began in January about 40 km southeast of Addis Ababa. Ethiopian Airlines says the first phase will be completed in 2030 and handle 60 million passengers annually. Capacity is expected to reach 110 million when fully developed, making it Africa’s largest airport.

The project is intended to accommodate the state-owned carrier’s rapid expansion. Ethiopian Airlines reported a 20% increase in revenue to a record $9.1 billion in the 2025-2026 fiscal year, according to the Ethiopian News Agency. It transported 20.7 million passengers and added nine aircraft and four international routes. The carrier now operates more than 170 planes and serves 150 international destinations.

The US is pushing to secure a role for American companies in a $12.5 billion Ethiopian Airlines airport project. Washington is seeking greater commercial and infrastructure influence in Africa, where China now has a stronger presence.

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for the Middle East and Africa Mark Mitchell described Bishoftu International Airport as a “transformative” project during a virtual briefing in Addis Ababa.

“Across agencies… the Department of Commerce has closely engaged in pushing to secure strong United States participation,” he said after talks with Ethiopian Airlines officials.

Mitchell did not identify potential companies or contracts, but said US involvement could result in “more Boeing aircraft powered by GE Aerospace engines.” Ethiopian Airlines agreed in April to purchase six additional Boeing 787-9s.

Construction began in January about 40 km southeast of Addis Ababa. Ethiopian Airlines says the first phase will be completed in 2030 and handle 60 million passengers annually. Capacity is expected to reach 110 million when fully developed, making it Africa’s largest airport.

The project is intended to accommodate the state-owned carrier’s rapid expansion. Ethiopian Airlines reported a 20% increase in revenue to a record $9.1 billion in the 2025-2026 fiscal year, according to the Ethiopian News Agency. It transported 20.7 million passengers and added nine aircraft and four international routes. The carrier now operates more than 170 planes and serves 150 international destinations.

Under a financing mandate signed last August, the African Development Bank plans to provide a $500 million loan and lead efforts to mobilize $8.7 billion for Bishoftu.

The US initiative comes as Washington competes with Beijing for trade, technology, and infrastructure cooperation in Africa. Ethiopian business newspaper Addis Fortune reported in January that China Communications Construction Company and Beijing Urban Construction Group were conducting initial site clearing and groundwork at Bishoftu.

Ethiopian Airlines has separately confirmed on its website that several Chinese firms and joint ventures were shortlisted to bid for the airport’s main construction and infrastructure packages.

The push comes despite lingering trade tensions. Ethiopia remains excluded from the US African Growth and Opportunity Act program after Washington suspended its eligibility in 2022, citing human rights violations during the conflict in northern Ethiopia.

RT News

Under a financing mandate signed last August, the African Development Bank plans to provide a $500 million loan and lead efforts to mobilize $8.7 billion for Bishoftu.

The US initiative comes as Washington competes with Beijing for trade, technology, and infrastructure cooperation in Africa. Ethiopian business newspaper Addis Fortune reported in January that China Communications Construction Company and Beijing Urban Construction Group were conducting initial site clearing and groundwork at Bishoftu.

Ethiopian Airlines has separately confirmed on its website that several Chinese firms and joint ventures were shortlisted to bid for the airport’s main construction and infrastructure packages.

The push comes despite lingering trade tensions. Ethiopia remains excluded from the US African Growth and Opportunity Act program after Washington suspended its eligibility in 2022, citing human rights violations during the conflict in northern Ethiopia.

RT News

The post US wants stake in Africa’s largest airport appeared first on The Zimbabwe Mail.

British prime minister says Infantino is not the right man to lead FIFA

British Prime Minister Andy Burnham said Sunday that FIFA President Gianni Infantino was not the right man to lead world soccer’s governing body in the latest fallout from the now abandoned plan to sell stakes in the World Cup to private investors. “I do not believe that he is the right man to lead football […]

The post British prime minister says Infantino is not the right man to lead FIFA appeared first on The Zimbabwe Mail.

British Prime Minister Andy Burnham said Sunday that FIFA President Gianni Infantino was not the right man to lead world soccer’s governing body in the latest fallout from the now abandoned plan to sell stakes in the World Cup to private investors.

“I do not believe that he is the right man to lead football forward on the world stage,” Burnham said. “The plan that was put forward was offensive to many people, football people, around the world, and it can’t be the case that we just move on and forget that, it wasn’t acceptable.”

On Saturday, European soccer’s governing body UEFA said it had lost confidence in FIFA’s leadership — possibly paving the way for a challenge to Infantino’s presidency. The governing body for North and Central American and Caribbean soccer (CONCACAF) said FIFA leadership had “stopped putting football first.”

Infantino was forced into a backdown over his controversial plans to sell World Cup profits through a commercial subsidiary that would run its top competitions.

Infantino’s plans fell apart after UEFA’s 55-member nations agreed Thursday to boycott the World Cup and all other FIFA competitions. CONCACAF and the Asian Football Confederation also said they opposed the plan.

Despite Infantino’s climbdown, UEFA said it would work with other confederations to “devise a plan to make sure that it cannot occur again.”

“No option should be off the table,” it said.

While Infantino has received pockets of public support from associations including 2022 World Cup host Qatar, Burnham’s words were further evidence of the anger generated by his plans.

The next FIFA presidential election is in March in Rabat, Morocco. The deadline for candidates to enter the presidential contest is Nov. 18, exactly four months ahead of the vote.

Source: AP

The post British prime minister says Infantino is not the right man to lead FIFA appeared first on The Zimbabwe Mail.

Infantino abandons plans to sell World Cup profits to private equity following massive pushback

GENEVA — FIFA President Gianni Infantino is abandoning his divisive plan to sell World Cup profits to private equity after receiving pushback from all corners of the soccer world. Infantino’s decision came after his senior adviser who sat on a White House panel resigned and Asia’s soccer body joined Europe and North America in opposing […]

The post Infantino abandons plans to sell World Cup profits to private equity following massive pushback appeared first on The Zimbabwe Mail.

GENEVA — FIFA President Gianni Infantino is abandoning his divisive plan to sell World Cup profits to private equity after receiving pushback from all corners of the soccer world.

Infantino’s decision came after his senior adviser who sat on a White House panel resigned and Asia’s soccer body joined Europe and North America in opposing it.

“Having listened carefully to all the views, it has become clear that the project has created divisions of a nature that, regardless of the level of support, are no longer in the interest of the objective set out in the first place,” Infantino said in a statement early Saturday. “Our purpose has always been — and will always be — to unite and improve. As a result, this proposal will not proceed.”

Infantino had proposed creating a $20 billion company to run the World Cup with private investors including the Kushner family, but drew backlash that grew every day since Tuesday’s announcement.

UEFA’s 55-member nations agreed to boycott the World Cup and all other FIFA competitions over Infantino’s plan on Thursday. North America’s CONCACAF and the Asian Football Confederation also said they opposed the plan.

“Some things are simply too important to sell,” UEFA said in a statement. “The FIFA World Cup belongs to football. It always will. And so long as Europe has a voice, it will never be for sale.”

Infantino’s senior adviser, Carlos Cordeiro, a former Goldman Sachs banker who represented the soccer body on the White House Task Force for the World Cup, resigned on Friday and urged other senior FIFA staff to speak out.

“I cannot stand by while FIFA considers selling a stake in the World Cup,” Cordeiro said in a statement, just hours after FIFA insisted: “Nobody is selling football.”

Hours later, FIFA chief operating officer Kevin Lamour issued a statement to The Associated Press, saying FIFA staff were deceived by Infantino’s lack of openness in planning the sale over recent months and that the project must not continue.

“It is the project of one person,” Lamour, a longtime colleague of Infantino at both FIFA and European soccer body UEFA, wrote. “Not only must this project not go ahead … but the time has now come for football political leaders to ask themselves the right questions and make the right decisions.”

Infantino has proposed spinning off FIFA’s commercial businesses — including World Cups and Club World Cups for men and women — into a $20 billion subsidiary with 20% owned by private investors.

The “anchor investor,” described by FIFA, is a New York-based investment firm created by Joshua Kushner, the younger brother of U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner.

The next FIFA competition is the Women’s Under-20 World Cup starting Sept. 5 in Poland — which UEFA members said they would boycott.

The misstep could prove costly for Infantino, particularly after the interventions by Lamour and Cordeiro.

Reelected unopposed in 2019 and 2023, Infantino is allowed one more four-year term under FIFA statutes. The deadline for the next presidential contest is Nov. 18, exactly four months ahead of the vote in Rabat, Morocco, where FIFA has its African headquarters.

Infantino’s job seemed secured despite long-term unease with his style and previous attempts to force through unpopular projects, but could become more tenuous with the failed private equity proposal.

Source: AP

The post Infantino abandons plans to sell World Cup profits to private equity following massive pushback appeared first on The Zimbabwe Mail.

Treasury denies ‘spending spree’ as OPC blows budget by 143 percent 

OPC spent ZiG17.18 billion in the first half of the year – almost 80 percent more than the health ministry Source: Treasury denies ‘spending spree’ as OPC blows budget by 143 percent – Zimbabwe News Now HARARE – Treasury has moved to defend the Office of the President and Cabinet (OPC) after its 2026 Mid-Term […]

The post Treasury denies ‘spending spree’ as OPC blows budget by 143 percent  appeared first on Zimbabwe Situation.

OPC spent ZiG17.18 billion in the first half of the year – almost 80 percent more than the health ministry

Source: Treasury denies ‘spending spree’ as OPC blows budget by 143 percent – Zimbabwe News Now

HARARE – Treasury has moved to defend the Office of the President and Cabinet (OPC) after its 2026 Mid-Term Budget and Economic Review Statement showed the office had spent 143 percent of its full-year allocation by the end of June, insisting the figure does not reflect OPC’s own operational spending or a budget overrun.

Finance minister Mthuli Ncube issued a statement on Friday to clarify that the reported utilisation “does not constitute operational expenditure by the Office of the President and Cabinet, nor does it constitute unauthorised expenditure or a budget overrun by the Office.”

He said the spending reflected government’s practice of centrally managing selected strategic national programmes and projects through the Office of the President and Cabinet, adding that “this arrangement enables the government to coordinate the implementation of cross-cutting programmes, accelerate project execution, strengthen oversight, and achieve greater efficiency in the utilisation of public resources across ministries, departments, and agencies (MDAs).”

Ncube said the expenditure covered priorities including refurbishing and upgrading hospitals, national social protection programmes, education and agricultural sector interventions, and digital economy projects.

“Expenditure incurred under these centrally managed programmes is initially recorded under the Vote of the Office of the President and Cabinet and then reallocated to the respective beneficiary ministries, departments, and agencies through the appropriate budgetary and accounting processes,” he said.

Figures from the Mid-Term Budget presented on Thursday show OPC spent ZiG17.18 billion in the first half of the year – almost 80 percent more than the health ministry, which used just 33 percent of its full-year allocation over the same period.

The transport ministry, meanwhile, spent ZiG5.05 billion against an approved budget of ZiG4.66 billion, a utilisation rate of 108 percent, reflecting ongoing infrastructure projects.

The government collected ZiG137.8 billion in revenue in the first six months of the year against total expenditure and net lending of ZiG123.6 billion, leaving a surplus of ZiG14.2 billion – meaning overall, government used less than half of its annual budget in the period.

Ncube said this “demonstrates the government’s continued commitment to prudent fiscal management.”

He urged the public, media and other stakeholders “to interpret the reported budget utilisation under the Vote of the Office of the President and Cabinet within the broader context of the government’s budget execution and public financial management processes,” stressing that the figure “should not be construed as expenditure solely attributable to the operations of the Office of the President and Cabinet.”

Ncube rejected characterisations of the spending as a “spending spree,” saying such references in some media reports were “inaccurate and misleading, if not mischievous, and was never mentioned in the minister of finance’s statement.”

He said government remained “firmly committed to fiscal discipline, transparency and accountability in the management of public resources,” and that all expenditure was subject to Treasury oversight, internal controls, audit and parliamentary scrutiny.

The post Treasury denies ‘spending spree’ as OPC blows budget by 143 percent  appeared first on Zimbabwe Situation.

Mr. Maponga, royalty cannot simply be dished out like GD6s!

Source: Mr. Maponga, royalty cannot simply be dished out like GD6s! The circus continues in the land south of the Zambezi. Self-proclaimed Pan-Africanist Joshua Maponga recently floated a bizarre proposal: Zimbabwe should transition into a monarchical state. If you value my social justice advocacy and writing, please consider a financial contribution to keep it going. […]

The post Mr. Maponga, royalty cannot simply be dished out like GD6s! appeared first on Zimbabwe Situation.

Source: Mr. Maponga, royalty cannot simply be dished out like GD6s!

The circus continues in the land south of the Zambezi.

Self-proclaimed Pan-Africanist Joshua Maponga recently floated a bizarre proposal: Zimbabwe should transition into a monarchical state.

If you value my social justice advocacy and writing, please consider a financial contribution to keep it going. Contact me on WhatsApp: +263 715 667 700 or Email: mbofana.tendairuben73@gmail.com

Even worse, he suggested crowning President Emmerson Mnangagwa as king under the romanticized banner of a reincarnated Munhumutapa.

It was tempting to dismiss the notion as mere sycophantic theater.

Yet, in a country where political praise-singing frequently masquerades as cultural revivalism, such reckless distortions of history cannot be allowed to pass unchallenged.

If Maponga and his co-thinkers genuinely wish to talk about restoring an ancient empire, then they must be forced to reckon with the actual historical, totemic, and genealogical realities of African statecraft.

You do not simply wake up, perform political acrobatics, and award a presidential politician an imperial crown that belonged to sacred ancestral dynasties.

If Zimbabwe were ever to reestablish either the Mutapa Empire or the Great Zimbabwe Kingdom, the rules of entitlement are rigid, well-documented, and strictly hereditary.

The Crown of Mutapa was founded around the 1430s by Nyatsimba Mutota, who migrated northwards from Great Zimbabwe into the Dande and Zambezi basins.

The royal houses (dzimba) that inherited this imperial throne carried specific ancestral totems—historically Nzou Samanyanga or Moyo—and established a sophisticated system of collateral succession (bavapa).

Succession was never an autocratic free-for-all; it rotated among senior sub-houses descended from Mutota, including the Chimbangu and Kandeya chieftaincies of the Mt Darwin and Dande regions, the Chirupata lines, and the Mukombwe royal house that consolidated the empire in the late 17th century.

Crucially, no ruler could claim the title of Mwenemutapa without formal spiritual sanction from the paramount mhondoro (royal spirit mediums) of the land, such as Mutota, Nyamhita Nehanda, and Karuva.

Similarly, if one looks at the throne of Great Zimbabwe, entitlement flows through an entirely different yet equally sacred royal lineage.

As Great Zimbabwe’s political center shifted, its authority was carried forward by the Torwa Kingdom and subsequently consolidated by the Changamire Dynasty of the Rozvi Empire.

The true royal crown of this era belongs exclusively to the Moyo Ndizvo lineage—descendants of Changamire Dombo and Tohwechipi.

Today, the rightful living heirs to this imperial legacy are embodied in recognized traditional chieftaincies such as Chief Jiri of Bikita, alongside the Rozvi lines of Chief Dyumbekuena and Chief Nhema.

The sacred ground itself remains under the historical custodianship of senior Karanga houses like Chief Mugabe and Chief Charumbira.

When measured against these authentic historical lineages, President Emmerson Mnangagwa does not fit into any imperial equation.

His lineage traces back through the Shumba Murambwi totem, rooted in the Chivi and Mberengwa regions.

While his family history carries its own localized traditional heritage, it holds zero genealogical or totemic claim to the royal thrones of either the Mutapa Empire or the Changamire Rozvi state.

Fabricating a mythical “reincarnated Munhumutapa” label to coat modern political authority in ancestral legitimacy is not only historical fraud, but an insult to the traditional institutions Maponga claims to champion.

Political power acquired through republican elections or constitutional office cannot be retroactively converted into bloodline monarchy.

Furthermore, traditional African statecraft understood the dangerous temptation of weaponizing sacred spiritual symbols for temporal power.

The mhondoro spirit mediums were not rubber stamps for political ambition; they were the ultimate custodians of constitutional restraint within traditional society.

By stripping the title of Munhumutapa from its sacred hereditary context and attempting to drape it around a sitting president, proponents of this monarchical pivot commit a double offense: they profane indigenous spirituality while attempting to bypass democratic accountability.

In ancient times, a ruler who attempted to manufacture a royal bloodline out of thin air would have been swiftly cast out by the spirit mediums and the council of elders alike.

In fact, if Maponga and his choir of praise-singers are so eager to comb through ancestral totems to find a legitimate king, they might want to watch what they wish for.

Being of the Nzou Samanyanga totem—the very mutupo of the founding Mutapa kings—I suppose I should start measuring myself for a crown.

By the unyielding rules of actual historical succession—the very rules Maponga so conveniently ignored—my bloodline puts me far ahead in the royal queue than President Emmerson Mnangagwa could ever hope to manufacture.

But unlike Maponga, I prefer to leave ancient empires in the history books where they belong.

  • Advertise your business, products, or services on my WhatsApp Channel with over 10k followers. For bookings, contact me on WhatsApp: +263 715 667 700 or Email: mbofana.tendairuben73@gmail.com

The post Mr. Maponga, royalty cannot simply be dished out like GD6s! appeared first on Zimbabwe Situation.