Zimbabweans question claim two-year term extension will improve development 

Source: Zimbabweans question claim two-year term extension will improve development — CITEZW Some Zimbabweans have questioned the government’s argument that extending the terms of the president and Parliament by two years will allow key development projects to be completed, saying the ruling Zanu-PF has had more than four decades in power without delivering meaningful improvements […]

The post Zimbabweans question claim two-year term extension will improve development  appeared first on Zimbabwe Situation.

Source: Zimbabweans question claim two-year term extension will improve development — CITEZW

Some Zimbabweans have questioned the government’s argument that extending the terms of the president and Parliament by two years will allow key development projects to be completed, saying the ruling Zanu-PF has had more than four decades in power without delivering meaningful improvements in public services or the economy.

The concerns were raised during an X Space discussion hosted by CITE on Friday following the enactment of the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment Act No. 3, which extends presidential and parliamentary terms from five to seven years, among other changes.

Participants argued that extending the tenure of the current Parliament and president would not automatically result in better governance or improved service delivery.

One participant, identified only as Craig, said elected leaders derive their mandate from voters and should seek a fresh mandate through elections rather than extending their time in office.

“We are the people who put leaders into power and if we want to remove them, we should have that right. Why extend the term by another two years? If the work could not be completed within the original mandate, what difference will two more years make?” he asked.

Another participant, identified as Cooksman, said the government’s justification that it needed more time to deliver development was unconvincing.

“We have had the same leadership for over 40 years. If they have failed to develop the country during that period, why should Zimbabweans believe another two years will change anything?” he said.

A participant identifying himself as Pan-African argued that the amendment placed greater emphasis on retaining political power than addressing citizens’ welfare.

“Our hospitals, schools and infrastructure have deteriorated under the same leadership. Why should Zimbabweans believe more time will produce different results?” he asked.

Other contributors questioned how extending Parliament’s term would improve livelihoods, saying constitutional amendments could not replace sound economic policies, job creation and improved public services.

However, another participant defended the amendment, arguing that Zimbabwe needed political stability and policy continuity to complete major infrastructure projects and sustain economic growth.

The participant said continued investment in roads, dams and other infrastructure showed that long-term government programmes required continuity rather than disruption through frequent elections.

The post Zimbabweans question claim two-year term extension will improve development  appeared first on Zimbabwe Situation.

MDC petitions ConCourt to nullify Mnangagwa term extension

Mnangagwa in breach of constitution by failing to order referendum, party argues Source: MDC petitions ConCourt to nullify Mnangagwa term extension – Zimbabwe News Now HARARE – The Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) has filed an urgent Constitutional Court application seeking to have the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment Act (No. 3) of 2026 declared unconstitutional, […]

The post MDC petitions ConCourt to nullify Mnangagwa term extension appeared first on Zimbabwe Situation.

Mnangagwa in breach of constitution by failing to order referendum, party argues

Source: MDC petitions ConCourt to nullify Mnangagwa term extension – Zimbabwe News Now

HARARE – The Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) has filed an urgent Constitutional Court application seeking to have the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment Act (No. 3) of 2026 declared unconstitutional, arguing that president Emmerson Mnangagwa was obliged to subject the law to a national referendum before signing it, and failed to do so.

The application, filed at the Constitutional Court in Harare on Thursday, cites the president, parliament, the justice minister and the attorney general as respondents.

MDC president Douglas Togaraseyi Mwonzora deposed the founding affidavit on the party’s behalf.

Mwonzora states in his affidavit that Mnangagwa signed the Constitution of Zimbabwe (Amendment) Bill HB1 into law on July 7 “without subjecting the bill to a referendum first,” despite what the party argues was a clear constitutional obligation to do so under section 110(2)(f), which places responsibility for calling referendums on the president.

At the heart of the challenge is Section 3 of the new Act, which repeals and substitutes section 92 of the constitution to provide that the president is elected by lawmakers sitting jointly as the Senate and National Assembly, rather than directly by voters.

Under the new provision, a presidential candidate must secure more than half of the valid votes cast, with a run-off held between the two leading candidates if no-one achieves a majority in the first round.

The amendment forms part of a broader package of constitutional changes. Section 5 of the Act extends the terms of office of the president from five to seven years, a change that, unusually, is stated to apply retrospectively to “the continuation in office” of the sitting president “notwithstanding” the constitution’s ordinary rule against amendments affecting serving officeholders.

Section 10 makes an identical seven-year extension for the life of parliament, again applying it to the sitting National Assembly and Senate.

The Act also makes a string of other changes, including empowering the Registrar General, rather than the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission, to register voters and compile voters’ rolls while increasing the size of the Senate from 80 to 90 seats, with 10 additional senators to be appointed directly by the president.

Mwonzora argues the change to the presidential election model strips ordinary citizens of their right to vote for president, a right guaranteed under Section 67(3)(a) to every citizen aged 18 and above, and in doing so amends the Bill of Rights “by implication.”

“What the above means is that the right to vote for president has now been removed from the general populace and is now a preserve of only those Zimbabweans who are members of parliament,” Mwonzora states in the affidavit.

Because the change touches the Bill of Rights, the application argues, Section 328(6) of the constitution required the bill to be put to a referendum before it could be presented for presidential assent.

Mwonzora further contends that Mnangagwa, as the direct beneficiary of the amendment, found himself approving a law that entrenches his own hold on office, precisely the conflict of interest he says Section 328(6) was designed to guard against.

The affidavit also draws a historical comparison, noting that since Zimbabwe introduced the office of executive president, all qualified voters, not just sitting MPs, have had the right to elect the head of state.

The new provision, it argues, introduces a “qualified franchise” for the presidency and disenfranchises the general populace in relation to that specific election.

The MDC is asking the Constitutional Court to declare that Mnangagwa failed to fulfil his constitutional obligation under sections 110(2)(f), 90(1) and 328(6), and to strike down Section 3 of the Amendment Act as invalidly promulgated.

As an alternative remedy, the party wants the court to order the president to subject the amendment bill to a referendum within three months of its passage by the Senate. The MDC is also seeking costs of suit against the respondents.

The post MDC petitions ConCourt to nullify Mnangagwa term extension appeared first on Zimbabwe Situation.

South African protesters go door-to-door forcing immigrants from their homes 

‘Foreigners’ fished out of their homes and thrown into the back of police vans Source: South African protesters go door-to-door forcing immigrants from their homes – Zimbabwe News Now JOHANNESBURG, South Africa – Groups of anti-immigration South Africans seized foreigners from their homes in Johannesburg on Thursday ​and handed them to police in a hardening […]

The post South African protesters go door-to-door forcing immigrants from their homes  appeared first on Zimbabwe Situation.

‘Foreigners’ fished out of their homes and thrown into the back of police vans

Source: South African protesters go door-to-door forcing immigrants from their homes – Zimbabwe News Now

JOHANNESBURG, South Africa – Groups of anti-immigration South Africans seized foreigners from their homes in Johannesburg on Thursday ​and handed them to police in a hardening of protests that have sown fear ‌in communities and strained ties with some countries.

In Johannesburg’s Alexandra township, a Reuters reporter saw protesters breaking down doors and entering houses where they believed undocumented immigrants were hiding.

They escorted the people to police vans where they were taken away, including a ​woman and a small child from Malawi. Another man who was apprehended by the marchers told ​Reuters he was in the country legally.

“I am a ZEP holder,” said the ⁠Zimbabwean national, Total Mhlanga, referring to the Zimbabwean Exemption Permit which allows tens of thousands of nationals ​to live and work in South Africa.

In Soweto, anti-immigrant protesters marched through town wielding sticks and flags, with ​plans to go search for undocumented immigrants. Several of the flyers for Thursday’s protests advertised a “peaceful march” followed by “door to door”. Another march took place in Durban on the east coast.

South Africa, where millions of people are unemployed, has seen a ​surge in anti-immigrant sentiment in recent months, culminating in nationwide protests on June 30, an informal deadline set ​for undocumented immigrants to leave the country.

The most prominent leader of the movement, former radio presenter Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma, said on ‌that day ⁠that protests would take place every Thursday until demands were met.

Her group, March and March, has painted undocumented immigrants as the source of South Africa’s economic problems and is demanding tighter border controls, mass deportation, and for schools and health centres to serve South Africans first.

“We are walking around doing door to door ​removing foreigners,” said a community ​leader, Bongani Msomi, at ⁠the march in Alexandra.

President Cyril Ramaphosa has warned against scapegoating immigrants for deep-rooted problems, and his government has repeatedly told citizens that they do not have the ​right to take immigration enforcement upon themselves.

Police have stepped up arrests of undocumented ​migrants in ⁠response to the protests, and have also deployed officers during recent marches for safety. A spokesperson for Johannesburg police was not immediately available for comment on the actions of the protesters or the officers at the scene.

Malawi’s government ⁠said ​on Thursday that over 38,000 of its citizens had returned from ​South Africa in recent weeks, as part of a massive repatriation effort due to safety concerns. Over 80,000 have also returned to ​neighbouring Zimbabwe. – Reuters

The post South African protesters go door-to-door forcing immigrants from their homes  appeared first on Zimbabwe Situation.

Of the Mugabes’ legacy of violence, impunity, and toxic entitlement

Source: Of the Mugabes’ legacy of violence, impunity, and toxic entitlement Pride usually comes before a fall. The continued allegations of violence surrounding the former first family expose a deep-seated pathology of entitlement that continues to plague Zimbabwe. If you value my social justice advocacy and writing, please consider a financial contribution to keep it […]

The post Of the Mugabes’ legacy of violence, impunity, and toxic entitlement appeared first on Zimbabwe Situation.

Source: Of the Mugabes’ legacy of violence, impunity, and toxic entitlement

Pride usually comes before a fall.

The continued allegations of violence surrounding the former first family expose a deep-seated pathology of entitlement that continues to plague Zimbabwe.

If you value my social justice advocacy and writing, please consider a financial contribution to keep it going. Contact me on WhatsApp: +263 715 667 700 or Email: mbofana.tendairuben73@gmail.com

This toxic arrogance was most recently highlighted by a savage confrontation with artisanal miners in Mazowe.

When Grace Mugabe reportedly orchestrates an attack and boldly declares herself “the Queen” during the assault, it reveals a problematic self-perception that goes far beyond mere political arrogance.

This is a family that does not merely view itself as above the law, but as inherently superior to the very citizens they once claimed to serve.

Such behavior is not an isolated outburst of temper; it is the natural consequence of decades of unchecked power and a chilling reminder of the toxic legacy left behind by the late former president Robert Mugabe.

For nearly 40 years, the Mugabe regime ruled Zimbabwe through a culture of fear, state-sponsored violence, and institutionalized lawlessness.

From the Gukurahundi massacres of the 1980s to the brutal electoral violence of 2008, the message from the top was always clear: power belongs to those who wield the loudest threats and the heaviest clubs, and the law is merely a tool to punish enemies, never a standard to bind the rulers.

This violent foundation set by the parents has inevitably shaped, influenced, and corrupted their children.

Raised in an environment where accountability was a foreign concept, the offspring of the former first family have repeatedly made headlines for public brawls and chaotic disruptions both within Zimbabwe and abroad.

They have firmly internalized the dangerous belief that their surname grants them a lifetime exemption from legal restraint.

This inherited arrogance has repeatedly spilled across our borders, creating recurring diplomatic and legal nightmares in South Africa.

The family’s pattern of cross-border lawlessness was famously highlighted by Grace Mugabe’s alleged extension cord assault on Gabriella Engels in 2017, but the younger generation has continued to push these boundaries.

Despite the South African courts later stripping away the farcical diplomatic immunity she used to flee the country, she remains safely ensconced in Zimbabwe, shielded from extradition by a protective political establishment.

This ongoing evasion of justice ensures that nearly a decade later, her victim still has no closure, perfectly illustrating how political patronage renders these criminal acts entirely consequence-free.

​Bellarmine Chatunga Mugabe’s recent high-profile criminal case in Johannesburg perfectly illustrates this trajectory.

He was originally arrested for attempted murder after a 23-year-old gardener was shot twice in the back at his luxury Hyde Park residence.

However, he managed to escape prison time through a controversial plea agreement in April 2026, pleading guilty only to pointing an object resembling a firearm and violating immigration laws.

Walking away with just a R600 000 fine and a deportation order, his escape from justice reinforces the sickening reality that for the elite, accountability can simply be bought.

The implications of this continued impunity are devastating for the moral and legal fabric of Zimbabwe.

When ordinary citizens witness individuals like Grace Mugabe and Chatunga Mugabe committing acts of violence with total disregard for law enforcement, it erodes public trust in the state.

It sends a damaging signal that there are two separate tiers of citizenship in Zimbabwe: one for the well-connected elite who can assault, exploit, and plunder at will, and another for the impoverished majority who are crushed by the full weight of the law for minor infractions.

This double standard perpetuates a dangerous cycle.

If the state refuses to protect vulnerable artisanal miners at Smithfield farm in Mazowe from the whims of a vengeful former ruling family, it invites anarchy, as people lose faith in formal justice and may eventually seek to defend themselves.

This persistent culture of impunity thrives because our state institutions have historically chosen political appeasement over constitutional duty.

True justice cannot be selective.

The ongoing tolerance of lawlessness from the former first family suggests that the ghost of institutional capture still lingers within our justice system.

True democratic progress cannot be measured solely by changes in political leadership; it must be demonstrated by the uniform application of the law.

A nation that coddles its former oppressors out of political sentimentality or fear remains shackled to the very tyranny it claims to have moved past.

It is time for this cycle of impunity to be decisively broken through the strict implementation of Zimbabwe laws without fear or favor.

The police, the National Prosecuting Authority, and our courts must treat these allegations of violence with the gravity they deserve, completely stripped of any regard for the suspects’ historical status.

No one, regardless of their family lineage or past political titles, possesses a divine right to terrorize citizens.

Grace Mugabe is not a queen, her children are not royalty, and the citizens of Zimbabwe are not subjects to be trampled upon.

If Zimbabwe is to truly transform into a modern constitutional democracy based on accountability and the rule of law, the state must demonstrate that the era of dynastic untouchability is permanently over.

Justice must be served, equality before the law must be vindicated, and the former first family must be made to understand that in Zimbabwe, the law is the only sovereign.

  • Advertise your business, products, or services on my WhatsApp Channel with over 10k followers. For bookings, contact me on WhatsApp: +263 715 667 700 or Email: mbofana.tendairuben73@gmail.com

The post Of the Mugabes’ legacy of violence, impunity, and toxic entitlement appeared first on Zimbabwe Situation.

Suspected UK family killer arrested in South Africa

SOUTH AFRICA – A United Kingdom man of Zimbabwean heritage wanted in connection with the murder of his wife and two children has been arrested in South Africa. Mkhanyisi Tshuma was apprehended in Kensington, Johannesburg, during a joint operation involving the South African Police Service Organised Crime Unit and Interpol. Tshuma is the prime suspect […]

The post Suspected UK family killer arrested in South Africa appeared first on The Zimbabwe Mail.

SOUTH AFRICA – A United Kingdom man of Zimbabwean heritage wanted in connection with the murder of his wife and two children has been arrested in South Africa.

Mkhanyisi Tshuma was apprehended in Kensington, Johannesburg, during a joint operation involving the South African Police Service Organised Crime Unit and Interpol.

Tshuma is the prime suspect in the deaths of his wife and two children, with authorities alleging that he fled to South Africa shortly after the incident.

While investigators are yet to release full details surrounding the circumstances of the murders, the case has attracted significant attention in both the United Kingdom and Zimbabwe.

South African authorities are expected to work closely with their British counterparts as investigations continue and possible extradition proceedings are considered.

More details are expected as the case unfolds.

The post Suspected UK family killer arrested in South Africa appeared first on The Zimbabwe Mail.