Zimbabwe Power Users Aim for $250 Million Floating Solar Funding 

Source: Zimbabwe Power Users Aim for $250 Million Floating Solar Funding – Bloomberg Project plans to be located on Lake Kariba in southern Africa Intensive Energy User Group to own 52% of development company Lake Kariba in Zimbabwe.Photographer: Guillem Sartorio/AFP/Getty Images Zimbabwe’s industrial electricity consumers and exporters aim to raise $250 million to build the […]

Source: Zimbabwe Power Users Aim for $250 Million Floating Solar Funding – Bloomberg

  • Project plans to be located on Lake Kariba in southern Africa
  • Intensive Energy User Group to own 52% of development company
Lake Kariba in Zimbabwe.
Lake Kariba in Zimbabwe.Photographer: Guillem Sartorio/AFP/Getty Images

Zimbabwe’s industrial electricity consumers and exporters aim to raise $250 million to build the first phase of floating solar panels on the world’s largest man-made lake.

Members of the Intensive Energy User Group, which also includes mining companies, will own 52% of a development company for the project to be located on Lake Kariba, between Zimbabwe and Zambia, according to a pre-feasibility study seen by Bloomberg. The electricity generated by the station, initially planned for 250 megawatts, will be sold to the group and other qualifying customers under a 25-year power purchase agreement.

Kariba Dam
Kariba Dam

Zimbabwe is facing acute electricity shortages that have resulted in blackouts lasting more than half a day because of low water levels that stifle generation from a hydropower plant on the lake and a thermal power station that experiences frequent breakdowns. Any excess output could also be exported throughout the region, according to the developers.

“It is envisaged that the generated electricity will be fed directly into the national grid for consumption by the IEUG, and/or sold to other suitable offtakers including trading on the Southern African Power Pool,” the Kariba Floating Solar Power Station Development Co. said in its report.

The Zimbabwe government sovereign wealth fund will hold a 10% stake in the company, with the remaining 38% available to investors including development banks.

Infrastructure investors including African Finance Corp. and Africa50 as well as private energy companies will be approached, according to Caleb Dengu, non-executive director at IEUG and a managing partner of CDF Trust and Consulting BV Ltd., a promoter of the project. A prospectus is being prepared for a road show, he said in an interview in Harare.

One gigawatt of capacity could be built at the site by having 1.8 million photovoltaic panels installed on 146 modular units, according to a March report compiled for Zimbabwe Power Co. by China Energy Engineering Group.

“We can save our mining companies from power cuts,” said Dengu, who added that such consumers can pay in sought after US dollars.

2023 ELECTIONS: Sweet news for CCC leader Nelson Chamisa

Veteran activists in Zimbabwe’s opposition are urging supporters to throw their weight behind Nelson Chamisa’s new Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC) party ahead of next year’s elections. The Veterans Activists’ Association of …

Veteran activists in Zimbabwe’s opposition are urging supporters to throw their weight behind Nelson Chamisa’s new Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC) party ahead of next year’s elections. The Veterans Activists’ Association of Zimbabwe (VAAZ), formerly aligned with the MDC Alliance, said members should mobilize behind the CCC as it challenges ZANU-PF for power in the […]

The post 2023 ELECTIONS: Sweet news for CCC leader Nelson Chamisa first appeared on My Zimbabwe News.

Zimbabwe’s hope: A wind of change to democracy

The country shed colonial and white rule but ushered in Robert Mugabe and then his vice-president, Emerson Mnangagwa, bringing with them the rise of a new authoritarianism Source: Zimbabwe’s hope: A wind of change to democracy | The Mail & Guardian In 1960, British prime minister Harold Macmillan famously declared, “The wind of change is […]

The country shed colonial and white rule but ushered in Robert Mugabe and then his vice-president, Emerson Mnangagwa, bringing with them the rise of a new authoritarianism

Source: Zimbabwe’s hope: A wind of change to democracy | The Mail & Guardian

ZIMBABWE-POLITICS-CHAMISA-CAMPAIGN

Supporters gathered to listen to Zimbabwe main opposition leader Nelson Chamisa of the Citizens Coalition for Change address outside Rudhaka Stadium in Marondera where the party was banned from hosting an election campaign rally in the stadium, March 12 2022. – Armed anti-riot police on Saturday blocked an opposition rally where thousands had gathered for an address by party leader Nelson Chamisa in Marondera 70km east of Harare. Thousands of Citizens Coalition for Change supporters defied and protested a court order to ban the rally with party leader Chamisa accusing the state of clamping down on its campaign. (Photo by Jekesai NJIKIZANA / AFP)

In 1960, British prime minister Harold Macmillan famously declared, “The wind of change is blowing through this continent. Whether we like it or not, this growth of national consciousness is a political fact.”

This quote captured a time that later became known as the period of African nations attaining majority rule — from the 1960s to 1980s — after a period of colonialism that lasted from the early 1800s to the 1960s. This was followed by a wave of democratisation (1990s to 2010), which saw the rise of multiparty regimes in most African nations. But, since 2010, the wind of change has turned and brought about a period of authoritarianism into which Zimbabwe’s August election falls. Rather than this election being a chance for a change in government, it is about defending the remaining vestiges of democracy in the country.

There has been a concerted effort of reversing democratic gains that can be termed as re-authoritarianisation. As noted by the Washington-based pro-democracy organisation,  Freedom House, most countries on the continent live in nations that are “partially or not free” and the number has gradually increased since 2010.

The re-authoritarianisation of Africa has been influenced by two key factors, the rise of right-wing populism and authoritarianism globally and African “Big Men” learning their lessons from the democratisation period. This will be explored through the prism of Zimbabwe’s political climate over the past 15 years.

In November 2016, something that was unthinkable a year earlier happened, Donald Trump won the United States presidential election. Analysts viewed this as a zenith moment for populism worldwide. Other events occurred such as Recep Erdogan becoming Turkey’s president and Narendra Modi becoming India’s prime minister in 2014, Russia annexing Crimea, the Brexit election in 2016 and China’s President Xi Jinping gradually strengthening his power in the Communist Party. These events strengthened ring-wing populism, which usually fights for neo-nationalism, social conservatism, economic nationalism and cultural/identity hegemony.

African leaders who wanted to indulge in authoritarian control found themselves in a global political climate that was willing to turn the other way as they reduced democratic space in their own countries. Yoweri Museveni in Uganda and Cameroon’s President Paul Biya amended their nation’s constitutions to stay in power longer. In Zimbabwe, a coup d’état replaced long-time leader Robert Mugabe with his vice-president, Emerson Mnangagwa. Big Men were taking firm control of the reins of their nations, creating a political axis of transnational authoritarianism, which was exemplified by the list of countries that voted against or abstained from the United Nations resolution against Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The Big Men in Africa, who usually rule by dictatorial means and for longer than two terms, learnt from the mistakes made by some of their counterparts during the democratisation period (in Africa. They realised that to hold on to power they had to employ a palatable form of authoritarianism that had the facets of a stable enough economy, regular albeit unfair elections and adequately compensating the key levers of state power — the constitutional court judges, the army and the economic elite. The star among the Big Men is Rwanda’s President Paul Kagame, who has combined socio-economic development alongside authoritarian control inspired by China’s developmental authoritarianism.

Zimbabwe’s President Mnangagwa has taken these lessons seriously and has enacted laws to support this. In 2018, a year after the coup d’état, he allowed the scheduled elections to go on to gain some legitimacy. Since then, bills and laws ,such as the Criminal Law Codification and Reform Amendment Bill (Criminal Code), contain reference to the  Patriot Act which punished so-called unpatriotic citizens. The Private Voluntary Organisation Bill, which is currently awaiting Mnangagwa signature, gives the government control and oversight over the financing of non-governmental organisations. Opposition leaders have been routinely arrested and convicted to instil fear among grassroots activists and demobilise campaigns against the government.

The irony of Zimbabwe’s situation in comparison to the 2008 election is that the nation is suffering hyperinflation. In 2008, the hyperinflation period led to Mugabe losing his first general election to Morgan Tsvangirai, the leader of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change, and later the Movement for Democratic Change. Mnangagwa has learned from this period and instead of the country functioning only with the hyper-inflationary Zimbabwe dollar, the US Dollar is also a currency of exchange, which is a refuge for citizen’s income and savings.

The period of democratisation came with unmet expectations in most African countries, when democratically elected leaders turned out to be authoritarian — as occurred with Zambia’s Edgar Lungu. And South Africa, which hitherto has been the citadel of democracy on the continent, has increasingly turned towards authoritarian colleagues for support. Promises of economic growth and equality have been stifled by global issues such as Covid-19, corruption and Africa’s poor position in the global economic structure.

In Zimbabwe, some critics have argued that opposition leaders did not effectively mobilise the hopes and anger of citizens, which they say resulted in significant voter apathy.

It is likely that the Zanu-PF will win the upcoming elections not because they would have won the popular vote freely and fairly but because the ruling party is doing everything in its power to hold on to power and further entrench it. The more worrying reality is that these elections may become a watershed moment to protect the visages and vestiges of democracy and its ideals in Zimbabwe.

This includes but is not limited to the freedom of expression, independence of media, and ensuring and protecting the right to vote. The opposition may receive a third of the vote. The one-third benchmark will provide some protection to the 2013 Constitution from being amended and further entrenching the ruling party’s power. This relies heavily on global democratic forces supporting the protection of the vote, which seems to rely on South Africa ending its “ostrich diplomacy” regarding Zimbabwe and instead becoming a defender of the rights and lives of Zimbabweans.

It is difficult for a generation of activists and opposition leaders to consider that their lives will be spent reaching out for a dream that might never materialise in their lifetimes. The hope, prayer and belief that they are the anointed generation to bring about democracy through elections keeps the fire burning in their hearts and minds. That fire should never be extinguished. But political reality also informs that the strategy for the upcoming elections calls to limit the damage against the increasing re-authoritarianism.

The period of the struggle for majority rule is informative. Nelson Mandela became the first president of a multiracial South Africa, Oliver Tambo lived and fought in exile for decades. Mugabe and Joshua Nkomo sat side-by-side at Lancaster House. Herbert Chitepo, who went into exile, led the Zimbabwe African National Union until his assassination in Zambia in 1975. This period seemed to require leaders with the mind and soul of Tambo and Chitepo.

Many times, leaders speak about how they stand on the shoulders of giants who came before them. But do they ever imagine themselves as having to be the giant whose shoulders will be stood on by the next generation or leader? It is a thankless job that risks one’s name being forgotten in the dustbin of history. But the risk of Zimbabwe and Africa becoming a cradle of dictatorships calls for a period of selfless leadership with the hope that the wind of change will eventually blow through the continent again towards democracy.

Kudakwashe Manjonjo is a democracy activist who has worked in civil society and community development. He is a Canon Collins PhD Scholar in Sociology at the University of the Witwatersrand. This article was a winner of Canon Collins Trust’s annual Lead with Your Mind: Troubling Power Essay Competition. The trust’s mission is to build a community of change agents across Southern Africa who create and use knowledge for positive social effect.

The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Mail & Guardian.

‘Very big role’: Jacob Zuma to represent Belarus at carbon credits conference in Zimbabwe

Source: ‘Very big role’: Jacob Zuma to represent Belarus at carbon credits conference in Zimbabwe | Business Former president Jacob Zuma leaves the Raymond Zondo commission of inquiry into state capture. (Photo by Gallo Images/Sowetan/Thulani Mbele) Former president Jacob Zuma will represent Belarus at a Zimbabwe conference on the trade in African carbon credits, according […]

Source: ‘Very big role’: Jacob Zuma to represent Belarus at carbon credits conference in Zimbabwe | Business

Former president Jacob Zuma leaves the Raymond Zondo commission of inquiry into state capture. (Photo by Gallo Images/Sowetan/Thulani Mbele)

Former president Jacob Zuma leaves the Raymond Zondo commission of inquiry into state capture. (Photo by Gallo Images/Sowetan/Thulani Mbele)

Former president Jacob Zuma will represent Belarus at a Zimbabwe conference on the trade in African carbon credits, according to the organisers of the event.

Zuma, who was seen entering the event venue in Victoria Falls, is due to deliver a “special presentation” on behalf of the Belarusian African Trade organisation on Friday, according to the agenda of the Africa Voluntary Carbon Credits Market Forum.

“There is a very big role he has to play at that conference,” Nkululeko Sibanda, spokesperson for the event, said, without elaborating.

Zuma, apart from presiding over an UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in 2011, has no known track record in the carbon credits industry but had close ties with Russia, an ally of Belarus, during his nine-year rule. His daughter, Duduzile Sambudla-Zuma was placed at the center of a Russia-backed Twitter campaign to bolster support for its invasion of Ukraine, according to research commissioned and funded by the Centre for Information Resilience.

A spokesperson for Zuma didn’t answer a phone call or respond to a text message seeking comment. The former president is facing a corruption trial in South Africa, related to a state arms deal. He has denied wrongdoing.

The organisers are also hosting John Hlophe, who was suspended as the top judge of South Africa’s Western Cape province, the agenda shows. Zuma and Hlophe are board members of the Belarusian African Trade Organization, according to Zimbabwe’s state-controlled Sunday News newspaper. Calls to Hlophe’s lawyer weren’t answered.

Hlophe, who was suspended for gross misconduct for trying to pressure judges to rule in favor of Zuma in a court case, has denied the allegations.

Zimbabwe has close ties with Belarus. President Alexander Lukashenko visited the African nation earlier this year amid pledges of agricultural and industrial investments. Russia, Belarus and Zimbabwe are sanctioned by the US.

Parliament adjourned: Update on Bill and Acts

Source: Parliament adjourned: Update on Bill and Acts BILL WATCH 25/2023 Three Bills Awaiting Signature by President On Tuesday 4th July Parliament sent the following three Bills to the President’s Office for assent and signature by the President: 1.  The Criminal Law (Codification) Amendment Bill [“Patriot Bill”] Veritas analysed this Bill in Bill Watch 1/2023 […]

Source: Parliament adjourned: Update on Bill and Acts

BILL WATCH 25/2023

Three Bills Awaiting Signature by President

On Tuesday 4th July Parliament sent the following three Bills to the President’s Office for assent and signature by the President:

1.  The Criminal Law (Codification) Amendment Bill [“Patriot Bill”]

Veritas analysed this Bill in Bill Watch 1/2023 of the 11th January 2023 [link] and concluded it was inimical to the rule of law and will have a chilling effect on freedom of speech.  It does not bode well for democracy.

2.  The Electoral Amendment Bill

This Bill will not apply to the general election in August, because section 157(5) of the Constitution states that after an election has been called, no amendment to the law has effect for the purposes of the election.

In any event the Bill, or parts of it, may be invalid because the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission may not have been consulted about it as required by section 157(4) of the Constitution.  ZEC was almost certainly not consulted about the amendments made to the Bill during its committee stage in the National Assembly.

3.  The Labour Amendment Bill

We commented on this Bill in Bill Watch 36/2022 of the 10th August 2022 [link].

After the President has signed these Bills they will be published in the Gazette as Acts of Parliament, and publication could be very soon – perhaps as early as tomorrow.

Private Voluntary Organisations [PVO] Amendment Bill

This Bill has been passed by Parliament and is still with the Attorney-General’s Office for checking.

Other Bills Being Prepared by Parliament for Signature by the President

Prisons and Correctional Service Bill

This is being printed as an Act.

Electricity Amendment Bill

This too is being printed as an Act.

Child Justice Bill

Proofs for the Act are being checked by Attorney-General

Comment: one of the first tasks of the next Parliament will be to amend this piece of legislation to harmonise it with the Children’s Act [see Bill Watch 22/2022 – link]

Children’s Amendment Bill

Again, proofs for the Act are being checked by the Attorney-General.

Police Amendment Bill

Proofs for the Act are being checked by the Attorney-General

Comment: We analysed this Bill in Bill Watch 55/2021 [link].  It will have no effect on the powers of police officers during the election period.

Institute of Chartered Loss Control and Private Security Management Bill

Here too, proofs for the Act are being checked by the Attorney-General.

Acts of 2023 Already Published

National Security Council Act [Chapter 11:22] (No. 1 of 2023)

This Act was published on the 17th March.

Judicial Laws Amendment Act, 2023 (No. 5 of 2023)

This Act was published on the 16th June.  It allows court cases to be held virtually, i.e. by electronic means that allow judges and parties to see and hear each other even though they are not physically present in the same place.  However, as we noted in Bill Watch 34/2022 [linkthere is no provision for the public and the press to be present or to tap into the proceedings, so “virtual” proceedings will not be public proceedings as required by the Constitution.  This will be problematic for the current election if Electoral Court cases are held virtually.

Other Matters Concerning Legislation before Parliament Adjourned

The Mines and Minerals Bill

The Parliamentary Legal Committee delivered an adverse report on this Bill on the 10th May.  The Minister of Mines and Mining Development delivered a lengthy and detailed reply to it, conceding some points but disputing others.  Then MPs made contributions to the debate, including Hon Biti who fiercely attacked the underlying philosophy of the Bill which he called a “horrible piece of legislation” rooted in the colonial past that should be rejected by all Zimbabweans, patriots and nationalists.  He urged the Minister to get guidance from model laws on responsible mining drawn up by the African Union, the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative and SADC.

Debate was then adjourned and did not resume before Parliament’s final adjournment at the end of the week.

Statutory Instrument 144: increase in nomination fees

This SI was challenged in the Constitutional Court.  On the 9th June the Court declared that Parliament, through its Parliamentary Legal Committee [PLC], had failed to carry out its constitutional duty to examine the SI, and ordered Parliament to do so by the 16th June.  See Election Watch 15/2023 [link].

Just before the House adjourned on the 13th June [and a mere eight days before nomination day] came the Acting Speaker’s announcement that the PLC had examined the SI and reported that it was constitutional.  MP’s had previously asked the Acting Speaker for an opportunity debate the report, but after the non-adverse report was announced they were not given the opportunity of debate.

Why has Parliament Adjourned until 22nd August?

This choice of Tuesday 22nd August as the day to which to adjourn is curious.  Not only is it the very day before polling day in the forthcoming general election, it is also the last day in the life of this Parliament – because section 143 of the Constitution states that:

“… Parliament stands dissolved at midnight on the day before the first polling day in the next general election …”.

Surely, no one expects both Houses of Parliament to meet at their usual times on the afternoon of Tuesday 22nd August – the eve of elections?  At best any meetings are likely to be token or virtual gatherings.

Comment: This matter was better managed when the previous Parliament came to an end in 2018.  Then, at the end of their last sittings, both Houses of Parliament adjourned to the day after polling day in the 2018 general election.  That was taken as an announcement that they would not meet again before the general election – without in any way detracting from the President’s power under section 146(a) to recall Parliament to duty.

Veritas makes every effort to ensure reliable information, but cannot take legal responsibility for the information supplied.