The Government has introduced a Digital Services Withholding Tax (DSWT), and the reaction in some quarters has been loud and angry. Social media posts show sharply higher charges on a US$100 payment as an example, leading many people to believe this is a brand-new tax on every digital transaction.
While that fear is understandable, it is not entirely accurate. Here is what the tax really is, and what it is not.
What is the Digital Services Withholding Tax?
The new tax is a withholding tax on payments made for digital services supplied by non-resident companies.
In simple terms, it targets foreign digital platforms that earn money from Zimbabwean users, but do not have a physical presence in the country. These include services such as online advertising platforms, streaming services, cloud software subscriptions, and digital marketplaces and apps operated from outside the country.
When a local bank or payment platform processes a payment to such a company, it is now required to withhold a portion of that payment and remit it to the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (Zimra) on behalf of the foreign supplier.
The logic, according to the Treasury, is fairness: local businesses already pay tax, while many global digital firms earn income from Zimbabwe without contributing to the tax base.
What the tax is not
Despite widespread claims, this is not a new tax on ordinary person-to-person transfers.
It is not:
A tax on sending money to family;
A tax on EcoCash or bank transfers between individuals;
A replacement or extension of the Intermediated Money Transfer Tax (IMTT);
A tax charged simply because you used your phone or card.
The Ministry of Finance, Economic Development and Investment Promotion has stressed that the tax is not levied on the customer as a separate charge, but is withheld from payments due to the digital service provider.
So, why are people seeing higher charges?
This is where confusion and anger arise. Banks and mobile money platforms already charge transaction fees, foreign currency settlement fees and the Intermediated Money Transfer Tax (IMTT); they now have withholding obligations as well.
When these costs are combined, the total deduction looks like a “new tax”, even when part of it is actually service charges or compliance costs passed on to users.
In short, while the tax is aimed at companies, the cost can still reach consumers.
This is why a US$100 payment can now attract much higher deductions than before, even though the law itself does not state “tax the customer”.
Who ultimately pays?
Officially, the tax is the responsibility of the foreign digital service provider.
In reality, as with many taxes worldwide, companies may increase prices, adjust fees or allow intermediaries to recover compliance costs from users.
This is why people feel the impact in their wallets.
Why the Government says it is necessary
The Treasury argues that Zimbabwe is simply joining many other countries that now tax the digital economy.
Without this measure, digitalisation would continue to erode the tax base, leaving the burden solely on workers and local firms.
The bottom line
The Digital Services Withholding Tax is not a tax on using digital payments, nor is it a new IMTT.
It is a tax on the income of foreign digital companies, collected at the point of payment.
However, while the law targets companies, ordinary Zimbabweans may still feel the pain, not because they are being taxed directly, but because costs inevitably travel down the chain. – Herald